Cloud, DevOps and Integration Services for Dependable Systems

They cover cloud architecture and migration, application environments, automated build and deployment workflows, monitoring, recovery, API development, and connections among software and business platforms.

Cloud computing provides infrastructure and managed technology services. DevOps improves how teams build, test, deploy, observe, and operate software. They often work together but are not the same.

TENSVA lists AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud capabilities. The selected platform and services depend on your application, data, skills, security, budget, and operating model.

Yes, where technically feasible. Work may include assessment, target design, data and application planning, testing, cutover, rollback preparation, monitoring, documentation, and handover.

TENSVA can audit architecture, access, environments, releases, performance, resource use, monitoring, backup, recovery, documentation, and ownership before recommending improvements.

It is an automated workflow that can build code, run checks, create a release artifact, require approval, deploy to an environment, and record what changed.

No. Kubernetes is useful for certain containerized and distributed workloads, but it adds operational responsibility. Simpler hosting or managed container services may be more suitable.

It represents infrastructure through reviewable, version-controlled configuration. This can make environments more repeatable and changes easier to track, while state, credentials, and approvals still require care.

It can improve visibility, ownership, resource review, and repeatability. Actual costs depend on architecture, usage, provider pricing, data transfer, commitments, and operational decisions; savings are not guaranteed.

TENSVA can develop REST or GraphQL APIs and webhook-based connections according to consumers, data, authorization, performance, documentation, and maintenance needs.

Often, yes, when suitable access and interfaces exist. Feasibility depends on provider capabilities, data, permissions, limits, terms, ownership, and required synchronization.

We define record ownership, mapping, validation, update direction, duplicate prevention, conflict rules, retries, logs, reconciliation, and human review where appropriate.

Potentially. An older system may connect through an API, database view, file exchange, queue, or adapter. We assess security, supportability, data, and risk first.

Depending on scope, monitoring may use health checks, structured logs, metrics, alerts, queues, retry tracking, dead-letter handling, reconciliation, and documented escalation.

The approach may include least privilege, managed identities, protected secrets, environment separation, secure authentication, validation, encryption, logs, dependency management, backup, and recovery according to risk.

Yes. Responsibilities, repositories, environments, review points, documentation, access, handover, and communication can be aligned with your team.

Ongoing support can be included through an agreed engagement covering defined systems, tasks, response expectations, maintenance, monitoring, and improvements.

Cost depends on the current environment, target architecture, applications, data, integrations, migration, security, testing, documentation, and support. TENSVA provides an estimate after discovery.

Timing depends on complexity, access, data, dependencies, testing, maintenance windows, approvals, risk, and rollback needs. A reliable schedule requires assessment.

Helpful inputs include business goals, application and system list, architecture notes, environments, known problems, integrations, data sensitivity, expected demand, constraints, and responsible stakeholders.